http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=rssfeed QSF Portal is a fast, secure, easily maintained PHP community portal. en QSF Portal 60 http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=203&p=892#p892 Ok, trying to re-add it beneath AdminCP Member Control category now throws an error of: <br /> [code]Duplicate entry 'ADMIN_MEMBER_DELETE-default' for key 'Piece'[/code] http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=203&p=892#p892 Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:45:25 PDT Support nobody@example.com (Kline) http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=203&p=891#p891 It should have been handled during the upgrade. Not sure why it wasn't but then this whole template system is plagued with issues like that. <br /> <br /> The contents should be: <br /> [code]<form action="{$this->self}?a=member_control&amp;s=delete&amp;id={$this->get['id']}" method="post"> <br /> {$this->table} <br /> <div class="title">{$this->lang->mc_delete}: {$member['user_name']}</div> <br /> {$this->lang->mc_confirm} <b>{$member['user_name']}</b>? <br /> <p class="line"></p> <br /> <br /> <input type="hidden" name="token" value="$token http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=203&p=891#p891 Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:33:57 PDT Support nobody@example.com (Samson) http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=203&p=890#p890 Hello, <br /> <br /> I was long running on 1.4.4 so last night I uploaded all files (sans settings.php) for 1.4.5, ran the upgrade script successfully, then repeated to step to 1.4.6. Today I went to go delete a spambot account and error out that template ADMIN_MEMBER_DELETE is missing. Was this eaten in the upgrade script? Not sure how it happened, everything was great under 1.4.4. <br /> <br /> At any rate, can someone please paste the contents of that template so I can re-add it? Thanks. http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=203&p=890#p890 Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:15:33 PDT Support nobody@example.com (Kline) http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=202&p=889#p889 That does make sense and sounds like a pretty clean solution from a programming perspective. http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=202&p=889#p889 Thu, 5 Aug 2010 20:46:51 PDT QSF Portal nobody@example.com (Conner) http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=202&p=888#p888 Yep. Apparently it didn't like the way QSFP's censor processing got wedged into Sandbox's bbcode parser. Since the censor code is used globally anyway I just moved the routine that queries them to the init() function. Guaranteed to only load once that way, regardless of how many segments need processing. http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=202&p=888#p888 Thu, 5 Aug 2010 19:07:44 PDT QSF Portal nobody@example.com (Samson) http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=202&p=887#p887 That's quite a difference. http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=202&p=887#p887 Thu, 5 Aug 2010 19:01:45 PDT QSF Portal nobody@example.com (Conner) http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=109&p=886#p886 That's pretty much what I was thinking too. http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=109&p=886#p886 Thu, 5 Aug 2010 19:00:11 PDT Feature Requests nobody@example.com (Conner) http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=202&p=885#p885 Good thing I spotted the latest mess when I saw this post with 56 queries. Now we're back down to 19 :) http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=202&p=885#p885 Thu, 5 Aug 2010 16:35:00 PDT QSF Portal nobody@example.com (Samson) http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=109&p=884#p884 Well unless CSS files can be used to execute malicious javascript code, the only person who is going to get screwed by deliberately uploading a bad one is the person using it. http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=109&p=884#p884 Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:32:38 PDT Feature Requests nobody@example.com (Samson) http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=109&p=883#p883 Even aside from the fact that the individual who most wanted this feature added is probably not really watching this thread anymore at this point, I'd think it's a feature that would be very little used. In fact, my guess would be that, even on a site with 10,000 users, as previously exampled, the odds are more likely of there being maybe 25-50 folks willing to configure and upload their own personal CSS style sheet than for 1,000 of them to choose to do so, and that's if you purposely raised aw http://www.qsfportal.com/index.php?a=topic&t=109&p=883#p883 Thu, 5 Aug 2010 11:29:27 PDT Feature Requests nobody@example.com (Conner)